<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="atom.xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <id>https://quinnmchugh.net/ideas</id>
    <title>Quinn McHugh's Idea Feed</title>
    <updated>2025-01-27T00:28:14.000Z</updated>
    <generator>https://github.com/jpmonette/feed</generator>
    <link rel="alternate" href="https://quinnmchugh.net/ideas"/>
    <subtitle>Half-baked, outlandish, and occasionally good ideas from Quinn McHugh</subtitle>
    <icon>https://quinnmchugh.net/img/favicon.ico</icon>
    <rights>Copyright © 2017-2025 Quinn McHugh</rights>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Welcome]]></title>
        <id>https://quinnmchugh.net/ideas/Welcome</id>
        <link href="https://quinnmchugh.net/ideas/Welcome"/>
        <updated>2025-01-27T00:28:14.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Ideas are cheap, so it's often best to share them freely.]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Ideas are cheap, so it's often best to share them freely.</p>
<p>This blog is for sharing my half-baked, outlandish, and occasionally good ideas with the world - most of which I'll never bring to life.</p>
<p>You're welcome to grab any of these and run with them.</p>
<p>Just remember: the execution is on you. <span role="img" aria-label="winking face">😉</span></p>]]></content>
        <author>
            <name>Quinn McHugh</name>
        </author>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Data Sharing Platform for Non-Profits]]></title>
        <id>https://quinnmchugh.net/ideas/2024/06/11/3d-org-chart</id>
        <link href="https://quinnmchugh.net/ideas/2024/06/11/3d-org-chart"/>
        <updated>2024-06-11T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Org charts, but in 3D//www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8B1RefkoBM]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Org charts, but in 3D: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8B1RefkoBM" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q8B1RefkoBM</a></p>
<p>Could use either:</p>
<ul>
<li>Rhino + grasshopper</li>
<li>OpenSCAD + <a href="https://github.com/SolidCode/SolidPython" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">SolidPython</a> + <a href="https://github.com/openscad/openscad-wasm" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">openscad-wasm</a> - see <a href="https://openscad.cloud/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://openscad.cloud/</a> for demo on how to run OpenSCAD in cloud</li>
<li>Create custom 3D environment with ThreeJS, BabylonJS, etc</li>
<li>Whatever libraries these folks use: <a href="https://github.com/130oclock/3D-organizational-chart/tree/main" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://github.com/130oclock/3D-organizational-chart/tree/main</a></li>
</ul>]]></content>
        <author>
            <name>Quinn McHugh</name>
        </author>
        <category label="Org Design" term="Org Design"/>
        <category label="Group Governance" term="Group Governance"/>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[LEED Rating System for Animal Welfare]]></title>
        <id>https://quinnmchugh.net/ideas/2024/04/12/leed-rating-system-for-animal-welfare</id>
        <link href="https://quinnmchugh.net/ideas/2024/04/12/leed-rating-system-for-animal-welfare"/>
        <updated>2024-04-12T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[What would a rating system look like for animal welfare standards?]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>What would a rating system look like for animal welfare standards?</p>
<p>Imagine if you could buy animal products with a seal corresponding to the "welfare rating", similar to the <a href="https://www.usgbc.org/leed" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">U.S. Green Building Council's LEED rating system</a>. How much would that influence consumer opinion?</p>]]></content>
        <author>
            <name>Quinn McHugh</name>
        </author>
        <category label="Animal Welfare" term="Animal Welfare"/>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[Scale of the Universe, but societal risks, charity effectiveness, and other  hard-to-grasp questions of scale]]></title>
        <id>https://quinnmchugh.net/ideas/2024/04/04/scale-of-the-universe-for-risks</id>
        <link href="https://quinnmchugh.net/ideas/2024/04/04/scale-of-the-universe-for-risks"/>
        <updated>2024-04-04T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[I'd love to see someone make a visualization like https://scaleofuniverse.com or this visualization of carbon emissions but for societal risks (e.g. power outages, terrorist attacks, pandemics, nuclear war, etc) or charity effectiveness.]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>I'd love to see someone make a visualization like <a href="https://scaleofuniverse.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://scaleofuniverse.com</a> or <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/posts/cameronunderwood_carbonfootprint-data-video-ugcPost-7175416155283587072-2SIM" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">this visualization of carbon emissions</a> but for societal risks (e.g. power outages, terrorist attacks, pandemics, nuclear war, etc) or <a href="https://www.givingwhatwecan.org/charity-comparisons" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">charity effectiveness</a>.</p>
<p>Understanding differences in orders of magnitude is unintuitive for the average person, which results in a number of biases in human perception and thus, societal decision-making. For example: despite what nuclear disasters lead us to believe, nuclear energy is one of the safest forms of energy generation.</p>
<p>Visualizations like Scale of Universe, which utilize the 3rd dimension (via scrolling in and out), seem to be remarkably effective at aiding people's ability to truly comprehend different orders of magnitude and thus, how much one thing (i.e. risk, intervention, etc) compares to another.</p>
<p>Creating visualizations similar to Scale of Universe, but for other kinds of important things, could serve as great tools for changing people's perceptions about the way the world is, especially regarding topics that are unintuitive.</p>]]></content>
        <author>
            <name>Quinn McHugh</name>
        </author>
        <category label="Decision-Making" term="Decision-Making"/>
        <category label="Data Visualization" term="Data Visualization"/>
        <category label="Social Change" term="Social Change"/>
    </entry>
    <entry>
        <title type="html"><![CDATA[StackShare for Individuals]]></title>
        <id>https://quinnmchugh.net/ideas/2024/03/22/stackshare-for-individuals</id>
        <link href="https://quinnmchugh.net/ideas/2024/03/22/stackshare-for-individuals"/>
        <updated>2024-03-22T00:00:00.000Z</updated>
        <summary type="html"><![CDATA[It would be nice if there was an open, file-based standard (similar StackShare's Tech Stack File) for sharing "tool stacks" (i.e. a list of tools used by an individual as part of their workflows and a list of relations indicating how that individual uses those tools together).]]></summary>
        <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice if there was an open, file-based standard (similar <a href="https://stackshare.io/tech-stack-file" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">StackShare's Tech Stack File</a>) for sharing "tool stacks" (i.e. a list of tools used by an individual as part of their workflows and a list of relations indicating how that individual uses those tools together).</p>
<p>There are so many tools out there, from email clients to task managers to note-taking tools to habit trackers to code IDEs to break-time reminders. Having a standard like this would allow individuals to freely share their "tool stacks" with one another and version control them as their tools and workflows evolve. Architecture diagrams could be generated from these files (e.g. YAML -&gt; <a href="https://mermaid.js.org/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Mermaid</a>), allowing others to easily understand and take inspiration from others "tool stacks".</p>
<p>If a standard like this could take hold, we would eventually see acronyms arise for referring to common bundles of tools (e.g. "ROZ" for Readwise + Obsidian + Zotero). If a database of "tool stack" files was put together, patterns in the ways people use different tools could be visualized to understand possibilities.</p>
<p>Perhaps resources like <a href="https://toolfinder.co/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">Tool Finder</a> could build on top of a standard like this and popularize it.</p>]]></content>
        <author>
            <name>Quinn McHugh</name>
        </author>
        <category label="Open Standards" term="Open Standards"/>
    </entry>
</feed>